Models for Explaining Consciousness in the Context of the Problem of Determining the Strong Form of AI
https://doi.org/10.26794/2226-7867-2024-14-4-89-100
Abstract
The article attempts to complement the modern problems of highlighting the criteria of strong AI through discussions in the field of philosophy of consciousness. The popular ideas of D. Dennett (“multiple sketches”), J. Searle (causal emergent description) and D. Chalmers (synthetic approach to understanding consciousness) are compared with the history of the formation of the AI problem. Despite the wide discussion of the problems of consciousness and artificial forms of intelligence (strong and weak), the theories and arguments of philosophers about the psychophysiological problem remain relevant. It is assumed that clarifying the mechanism of analytical work of consciousness, the creative potential of the individual, the ability to cover a variety of phenomena in categorical forms, building axiomatic and synthetic judgments will expand the tools of machine learning. To complement the existing ideas about consciousness in the context of the prevalence of information approaches (D.I. Dubrovsky) and the analytical tradition (V.V. Vasiliev), the key provisions of the psychophysiological problem identified in the history of German and Russian philosophy are given. Given the complexity and versatility of the identified problems (definition of consciousness, psychophysiological problem, definition of AI, demarcation of weak and strong forms of AI, the importance of language for building structures of thinking, analog thinking and its capabilities), the content of the article is limited to analyzing emerging trends in philosophy and identifying prospects for further deepening into the problem.
About the Authors
V. N. BelovRussian Federation
Vladimir N. Belov — Dr. Sci. (Philos.), Prof., Head of the Department of Ontology and Theory of Cognition, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
Moscow
S. A. Malofeikin
Russian Federation
Sergey A. Malofeikin — Postgraduate Student at the Department of Ontology and Theory of Cognition, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
Moscow
References
1. Wiener N. Cybernetics: or control and communication in the animal and the machine. NY: M.I.T. Press; 1985. 212 p.
2. Neiman J. von. Computer and brain. Moscow: AST; 2023. 192 p. (In Russ.).
3. Tsvyk V.A., Tsvyk I.V., Pavlova T.P. The problematic area of philosophical discourses on the application of artificial intelligence systems in society. RUDN Journal of Philosophy. 2023;4(27):928–939. DOI: 10.22363/2313-2302-2023-27-4-928-939
4. Tetyuyev L.I. Jurgen Habermas’s philosophy of language: A rational theory of universal pragmatics. Izv. Saratov Univ. (N. S.), Ser. Philosophy. Psychology. 2019;2(19):171–175. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.18500/1819–7671–2019–19–2–171–175
5. Chekushkina E.N. The communicative theory of Yu. Habermas and the culture of the Information Society. Teoriya i praktika obshhestvennogo razvitiya = Theory and practice of social development. 2014;1:25–27. (In Russ.).
6. Volkov D.B. The Boston zombie: D. Dennett and his theory of consciousness. M.: LENAND; 2019. 320 p. (In Russ.).
7. Dennett D. Types of the psyche: On the way to understanding consciousness. M.: Idea Press; 2004. 184 p. (In Russ.).
8. Serle J. Rationality in action. M.: Progress-Tradition; 2004. 336 p. (In Russ.).
9. Chalmers D. The conscious mind: In search of a fundamental theory. Moscow: URSS; 2013. 512 p. (In Russ.).
10. Penrose R. The new mind: About computers, thinking and the laws of physics. M.: URSS; 2022. 416 p. (In Russ.).
11. Vladimirov P.A. The significance of criticism of the “New psychophysiological law” by A.I. Vvedensky in Russian philosophy. Kantovskij sbornik = The Kantian collection. 2017;1(36):52–65. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.5922/0207–6918–2017–1–5
12. Rubinstein S.L. Being and consciousness. St. Petersburg: Peter; 2012. 288 p. (In Russ.).
13. Belov V.N. Philosophical theories of V.E. Seseman and S. L. Rubinstein. Lichnost`. Kul`tura. Obshhestvo = Personality. Culture. Society. 2023;1–2(25):61–75. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.30936/1606_951X_2023_25_1_2_61_75
14. Dubrovsky D.I. The problem of the ideal. Subjective reality. M.: Canon+; 2002. 368 p. (In Russ.).
15. Dubrovsky D.I. The problem of “consciousness and the brain”: An information approach. Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie = Knowledge. Understanding. Ability. 2013;4:92–98. (In Russ.).
16. Ivanov D.V.Virtualization of society. Version 2.0. St. Petersburg: “Peterburgskoye Vostokovedenie”; 2002. 224 p. (In Russ.).
17. Vasiliev V.V. Consciousness and things. An essay on phenomenalistic ontology. Moscow: Knizny Dom “LIBROCOM”; 2014. 240 p. (In Russ.).
18. Kuznetsov A.V. Local interactionism. New solutions to the problem of mental causality. Voprosy` filosofii = Questions of philosophy. 2016;1:148–161. (In Russ.).
19. Albus J., Meystel A. Behavior Generation in intelligent systems. Gaithersburg (USA); 1997. 219 p.
Review
For citations:
Belov V.N., Malofeikin S.A. Models for Explaining Consciousness in the Context of the Problem of Determining the Strong Form of AI. Humanities and Social Sciences. Bulletin of the Financial University. 2024;14(4):89-100. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26794/2226-7867-2024-14-4-89-100