humanitiesГуманитарные науки. Вестник Финансового университетаHumanities and Social Sciences. Bulletin of the Financial University2226-78672619-1482Financial University under The Government of Russian Federation10.26794/2226-7867-2022-12-5-127-135humanities-773Research ArticleАКТУАЛЬНЫЕ СОЦИАЛЬНО-ПОЛИТИЧЕСКИЕ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЯCURRENT SOCIO-POLITICAL RESEARCHОсновные особенности климатической повестки Партии европейских социалистовMain Features of the Climate Change Agenda of the Party of European Socialistshttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2457-3466ЛисенковаА. Д.LisenkovaA. D.

Алена Денисовна Лисенкова —  аспирантка факультета международных отношений

Санкт-Петербург

Alena D. Lisenkova —  postgraduate student, School of International Relations

Saint Petersburg

alena.denisovna@yandex.ruСанкт-Петербургский государственный университетРоссияSaint Petersburg State UniversityRussian Federation202215112022125127135Copyright © Лисенкова А.Д., 20222022Лисенкова А.Д.Lisenkova A.D.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://humanities.fa.ru/jour/article/view/773

Данная статья посвящена климатической повестке Партии европейских социалистов (ПЕС). С целью выявления ее текущих основных особенностей автор дает характеристику развитию климатического дискурса партии под влиянием социалистических, рабочих и социал-демократических идеологических основ, а также политической обстановки в Европейском союзе на разных исторических этапах. С помощью сравнительного анализа и дискурс-анализа исследуются как общая эволюция и основные принципы Партии европейских социалистов и ее политической группы, Прогрессивного альянса социалистов и демократов, так и непосредственно развитие и текущие приоритеты климатической повестки. Данный анализ проводится через призму предвыборных манифестов и риторики первых лиц. Актуальность исследования заключается в первостепенности проблемы изменения климата для Европейского союза и его граждан, а также проводимой на современном этапе существенной климатической модернизации наднационального законодательства под руководством Франса Тиммерманса, члена Партии европейских социалистов и Исполнительного вице-президента Европейской комиссии по европейской «Зеленой сделке».

This article is devoted to the climate change agenda of the Party of European Socialists. In order to identify its current main features, the author characterizes the development of the climate discourse of the party under the influence of socialist, workers and social-democratic ideological foundations, as well as the political situation in the European Union at various historical stages. Through comparative analysis and discourse analysis, the general evolution and main principles of the Party of European Socialists and its political group, the Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats, as well as the actual development and current priorities of the climate agenda are investigated. Comparative analysis and discourse analysis are carried out through the prism of election manifestos and the top officials’ rhetoric. The relevance of the study lies in the primacy of climate change for the European Union and its citizens, as well as the substantial modernization of supranational legislation under the leadership of Frans Timmermans, a member of the Party of European Socialists and Executive Vice-President of the European Commission for the European “Green Deal”.

Партия европейских социалистовПрогрессивный альянс социалистов и демократовизменение климатаманифестевропейская «Зеленая сделка»Франс Тиммерманссправедливый переходсоциальная справедливость Party of European SocialistsProgressive Alliance of Socialists and Democratsclimate changemanifestoEuropean “Green Deal”Frans Timmermansjust transitionsocial justiceReferencesAust A. From ‘Eurokeynesianism’ to the ‘Third Way’: The Party of European Socialists (PES) and European employment policies. Social Democratic Party Policies in Contemporary Europe. Bonoli G., Powell M., eds. London: Routledge; 2003.Aust A. From ‘Eurokeynesianism’ to the ‘Third Way’: The Party of European Socialists (PES) and European employment policies. Social Democratic Party Policies in Contemporary Europe. Bonoli G., Powell M., eds. London: Routledge; 2003.Lodge J., Herman V. Direct Elections to the European Parliament: A Community Perspective. London: Palgrave Macmillan; 1982.Lodge J., Herman V. Direct Elections to the European Parliament: A Community Perspective. London: Palgrave Macmillan; 1982.Hix S. The Party of European Socialists. Social Democratic Parties in the European Union: History, Organization, Policies. Ladrech R., Marlière P., eds. London: Palgrave Macmillan; 1999.Hix S. The Party of European Socialists. Social Democratic Parties in the European Union: History, Organization, Policies. Ladrech R., Marlière P., eds. London: Palgrave Macmillan; 1999.Houser T. Copenhagen, the Accord, and the Way Forward. Policy Brief. 2010;10(5):1–17.Houser T. Copenhagen, the Accord, and the Way Forward. Policy Brief. 2010;10(5):1–17.Hovi J., Skodvin T., Andresen S. The Persistence of the Kyoto Protocol: Why Other Annex I Countries Move on Without the United States. Global Environmental Politics. 2003;3(4):1–23.Hovi J., Skodvin T., Andresen S. The Persistence of the Kyoto Protocol: Why Other Annex I Countries Move on Without the United States. Global Environmental Politics. 2003;3(4):1–23.Van Schaik L. G., Schunz S. Explaining EU Activism and Impact in Global Climate Politics: Is the Union a Norm- or Interest-Driven Actor? Journal of Common Market Studies. 2011;50(1):169–186.Van Schaik L. G., Schunz S. Explaining EU Activism and Impact in Global Climate Politics: Is the Union a Norm- or Interest-Driven Actor? Journal of Common Market Studies. 2011;50(1):169–186.Bäckstrand K., Elgström O. The EU’s Role in Climate Change Negotiations: from Leader to ‘Leadiator’. Journal of European Public Policy. 2013;20(10):1369–1386.Bäckstrand K., Elgström O. The EU’s Role in Climate Change Negotiations: from Leader to ‘Leadiator’. Journal of European Public Policy. 2013;20(10):1369–1386.Bosello F., Buchner B. The Kyoto Protocol: Current State and Implication for EU-25 Member States. A Focus on Agriculture and Forestry. MEACAP WP2 D 3. London: Institute for European Environmental Policy; 2004.Bosello F., Buchner B. The Kyoto Protocol: Current State and Implication for EU-25 Member States. A Focus on Agriculture and Forestry. MEACAP WP2 D 3. London: Institute for European Environmental Policy; 2004.Groen L., Niemann A., Oberthür S. The EU as a Global Leader? The Copenhagen and Cancún UN Climate Change Negotiations. Journal of Contemporary European Research. 2012;8(2):173–191.Groen L., Niemann A., Oberthür S. The EU as a Global Leader? The Copenhagen and Cancún UN Climate Change Negotiations. Journal of Contemporary European Research. 2012;8(2):173–191.Kiyar D., Wittneben B. B.F. Nuclear Energy in the European Union after Fukushima: Political and Economic Considerations. CESifo DICE Report. 2012;10(3):9–15.Kiyar D., Wittneben B. B.F. Nuclear Energy in the European Union after Fukushima: Political and Economic Considerations. CESifo DICE Report. 2012;10(3):9–15.Kreienkamp J. The Long Road to Paris: The History of the Global Climate Change Regime. Brussels: Global Governance Institute; 2019.Kreienkamp J. The Long Road to Paris: The History of the Global Climate Change Regime. Brussels: Global Governance Institute; 2019.Леонард М., Пизани-Ферри Ж., Шапиро Д., Тальяпиетра С., Вульф Г. Геополитика «Зеленой сделки» Европейского союза. Вестник международных организаций. 2021;16(2):204–235.Leonard M., Pisani-Ferry J., Shapiro J., Tagliapietra S., Wolf G. The Geopolitics of the European Green Deal. Vestnik mezhdunarodnyh organizacij = International Organisations Research Journal. 2021;16(2):204–235. (In Russ.).

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.