humanitiesГуманитарные науки. Вестник Финансового университетаHumanities and Social Sciences. Bulletin of the Financial University2226-78672619-1482Financial University under The Government of Russian Federation10.26794/2226-7867-2019-9-4-36-45humanities-342Research ArticleФУНДАМЕНТАЛЬНОЕ НАУЧНОЕ ЗНАНИЕFUNDAMENTAL SCIENTIFIC KNOWLEDGEЗапрещение коммунистической символики в посткоммунистических странахThe Prohibition of Communist Symbols in Post-Communist CountriesМелешкинаЕ. Ю.MeleshkinaE. Yu.

Мелешкина Елена Юрьевна, д-р полит. наук, заведующая отделом политической науки ИНИОН РАН; профессор

Meleshkina E. Yu., Dr Sci. in Political Sciences, Head of Political Science Department, INION RAS; Professor

elenameleshkina@yandex.ruМГИМО(У) МИД РФРоссияMGIMO(University) under The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian FederationRussian Federation201903122019943645Copyright © Мелешкина Е.Ю., 20192019Мелешкина Е.Ю.Meleshkina E.Y.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://humanities.fa.ru/jour/article/view/342

В статье рассматривается принятие законодательных норм о запрете коммунистических символов в посткоммунистических странах. Выявляется влияние на этот процесс различных условий: вхождение в состав СССР или Российской империи, опыт самостоятельной государственности в XX в., членство в Европейском союзе, отсутствие доминирующего политического актора и ресурсов для под- держания его доминирования, популярность партии — «преемницы» коммунистической, радикализм институциональных реформ. Рассматривается также влияние изменений международной среды, в том числе отношений с Россией. Дается типология стран, запретивших коммунистическую символику, сформированная на основе различных сочетаний условий.

The article focuses on communist symbols bans in post-communist countries. The author highlights the influence of various conditions such as existence as a part of USSR or Russian empire, the experience of independent state-building in XX century, membership in European Union, lack of dominant political actor and resources for his long domination, the popularity of successor parties, the radicalism of institutional reforms. The analysis also accounts associated impacts of international environment and relations of post-communist countries with Russia. Based on a combination of various conditions, the author develops a typology of post-communist states where communist symbols have been banned.

политика памятипосткоммунистические страныкоммунистические символыформирование нациидекоммунизацияmemory politicspost-communist countriescommunist symbolsnation-buildingde-communisationReferencesBrubaker R. Ethnicity without Groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 2004. 283 p.Brubaker R. Ethnicity without Groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 2004. 283 p.Koposov N. Memory Laws, Memory Wars: The Politics of the Past in Europe and Russia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2017. 338 p.Koposov N. Memory Laws, Memory Wars: The Politics of the Past in Europe and Russia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2017. 338 p.Мелешкина Е. Ю. Постимперские пространства: Особенности формирования государств и наций. Политическая наука. 2013;(3):10–29. Meleshkina E. Yu. Post-imperial spaces: Peculiarities of state and nation-building. Politicheskaya nauka. 2013;(3):10–29. (In Russ.).Мелешкина Е. Ю. Постимперские пространства: Особенности формирования государств и наций. Политическая наука. 2013;(3):10–29. Meleshkina E. Yu. Post-imperial spaces: Peculiarities of state and nation-building. Politicheskaya nauka. 2013;(3):10–29. (In Russ.).Мелешкина Е. Ю. Формирование новых государств в Восточной Европе: монография. М.: ИНИОН РАН; 2012. 252 c. Meleshkina E. Yu. Formation of new States in Eastern Europe: Monograph. Moscow: INION RAN; 2012. 252 p. (In Russ.).Мелешкина Е. Ю. Формирование новых государств в Восточной Европе: монография. М.: ИНИОН РАН; 2012. 252 c. Meleshkina E. Yu. Formation of new States in Eastern Europe: Monograph. Moscow: INION RAN; 2012. 252 p. (In Russ.).Mälksoo M. ‘Memory must be defended’: Beyond the politics of mnemonical security. Security Dialogue. 2015:46(3):221–237.Mälksoo M. ‘Memory must be defended’: Beyond the politics of mnemonical security. Security Dialogue. 2015:46(3):221–237.Stark D., Bruszt L. Post-socialist pathways: Transforming politics and property in East Central Europe. New York, N.Y.: Cambridge University Press; 1998. 300 p.Stark D., Bruszt L. Post-socialist pathways: Transforming politics and property in East Central Europe. New York, N.Y.: Cambridge University Press; 1998. 300 p.Grzymala-Buss A. Redeeming the Past: the Regeneration of the Communist Successor Parties in East Central Europe after 1989. New York, N.Y.: Cambridge University Press; 2002. 341 p.Grzymala-Buss A. Redeeming the Past: the Regeneration of the Communist Successor Parties in East Central Europe after 1989. New York, N.Y.: Cambridge University Press; 2002. 341 p.Huntington S. P. The Third Wave: Democratization in the Last Twentieth Century. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press; 1993.Huntington S. P. The Third Wave: Democratization in the Last Twentieth Century. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press; 1993.Welsh H. Dealing with the Communist Past: Central and East European Experiences after 1990. Europe- Asia Studies. 1996;48(3):419–428.Welsh H. Dealing with the Communist Past: Central and East European Experiences after 1990. Europe- Asia Studies. 1996;48(3):419–428.McFaul M. The fourth wave of democracy and dictatorship: Noncooperative Transitions in the Postcommunist World. World Politics. 2002;54(1):212–244.McFaul M. The fourth wave of democracy and dictatorship: Noncooperative Transitions in the Postcommunist World. World Politics. 2002;54(1):212–244.Мелешкина Е. Ю. Государственное строительство и институциональная трансплантация в посткоммунистических странах. Политическая наука. 2016;(4):186–213. Meleshkina E. Yu. State-Building and Institutional Transplantation in Post-Communist Countries. Politicheskaya nauka. 2016;(4):186–213. (In Russ.).Мелешкина Е. Ю. Государственное строительство и институциональная трансплантация в посткоммунистических странах. Политическая наука. 2016;(4):186–213. Meleshkina E. Yu. State-Building and Institutional Transplantation in Post-Communist Countries. Politicheskaya nauka. 2016;(4):186–213. (In Russ.).Scharpf F. Institutions in comparative policy research. Comparative political studies. 2000;33(6–7):762–790.Scharpf F. Institutions in comparative policy research. Comparative political studies. 2000;33(6–7):762–790.Capoccia G., Kelemen D. The Study of Critical Junctures: Theory, Narrative, and Counterfactuals in Historical Institutionalism. World Politics. 2007;59(2):341–369.Capoccia G., Kelemen D. The Study of Critical Junctures: Theory, Narrative, and Counterfactuals in Historical Institutionalism. World Politics. 2007;59(2):341–369.Mahoney J. The legacies of liberalism: Path dependence and political regimes in Central America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 2001. 416 p.Mahoney J. The legacies of liberalism: Path dependence and political regimes in Central America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 2001. 416 p.Pierson P., Skocpol T. Historical institutionalism in contemporary political science: Paper prepared for presentation at the American Political Science Association Meetings. Washington, D.C.; 2000.Pierson P., Skocpol T. Historical institutionalism in contemporary political science: Paper prepared for presentation at the American Political Science Association Meetings. Washington, D.C.; 2000.Frye T. Building States and Markets after Communism: The Perils of Polarized Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010. 296 p.Frye T. Building States and Markets after Communism: The Perils of Polarized Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010. 296 p.Palonen E. Political Polarisation and Populism in Contemporary Hungary. Parliamentary Affairs. 2009;62(2):318–334.Palonen E. Political Polarisation and Populism in Contemporary Hungary. Parliamentary Affairs. 2009;62(2):318–334.Belavusau U., Gliszczyńska-Grabias A. Memory Laws: Mapping a New Subject in Comparative Law and Transitional Justice. In: Law and Memory: Towards Legal Governance of History. U. Belavusau, A. Gliszczyńska-Grabias, eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2017.Belavusau U., Gliszczyńska-Grabias A. Memory Laws: Mapping a New Subject in Comparative Law and Transitional Justice. In: Law and Memory: Towards Legal Governance of History. U. Belavusau, A. Gliszczyńska-Grabias, eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2017.Marples D. R. Decommunization, Memory Laws, and “Builders of Ukraine in the 20th Century”. Acta Slavica Iaponica, 2018;(39):1–22.Marples D. R. Decommunization, Memory Laws, and “Builders of Ukraine in the 20th Century”. Acta Slavica Iaponica, 2018;(39):1–22.Мелешкина Е. Ю. Отвергая символику прошлого: влияние условий политического развития на принятие законов о декоммунизации. Политическая наука. 2018;(1):148–172. Meleshkina E. Yu. Rejecting symbols of the past: Impact of political conditions on de-communisation laws. Politicheskaya nauka. 2018;(1):148–172. (In Russ.).Мелешкина Е. Ю. Отвергая символику прошлого: влияние условий политического развития на принятие законов о декоммунизации. Политическая наука. 2018;(1):148–172. Meleshkina E. Yu. Rejecting symbols of the past: Impact of political conditions on de-communisation laws. Politicheskaya nauka. 2018;(1):148–172. (In Russ.).

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.